We all tend to believe that mankind is on a path of continuous progress and ever-increasing prosperity, driven by good fortune and human ingenuity. Is that just wishful thinking or could it actually be true?
From a macro perspective
If you want to investigate the development of humankind, don't be shy, do it at a truly global scale. And why not begin with, say, the end of the last ice age, some 16,000 years ago? Too ambitious? Well, that is exactly the approach that Ian Morris took in "Why the West Rules – For Now".
A working definition …
As a first waypoint on this journey, I sense that it is helpful to reflect on how I intend to use the term "innovation" in the course of the evolving discussion. Today, I offer a working definition.
The myth of unlimited capacity
Humanity has proved to be incredibly innovative in adjusting our living conditions to our advantage. It seems as if our collective ingenuity was absolutely superior and capable of mastering any kind of problem. But is this really true??
Innovation is all good. Isn’t it …??
We all want innovation, don't we? The latest gadget, the more efficient manufacturing technology, a more competitive business model, prosperity and social development for all. That's all very positive, right?
understanding innovation 